Why do some small businesses rely on the TFWP?
- Labour shortages are very real, including for entry level workers. Many employers simply cannot find enough workers locally. This is especially true in rural, remote, resource and resort communities. The labour pool isn’t there, regardless of wages.
- Not every job gets applicants. Certain sectors, occupations and shifts struggle to attract Canadian workers, even at higher pay. Small businesses often turn to the TFWP as a last resort, when local recruitment fails.
- Hiring a temporary foreign worker (TFW) is costly and complex. To employ even one entry-level TFW, businesses have reported paying around $10,000 in fees and permits, outside agencies or consultants, return airfare to the worker’s home country, health insurance and more. Hiring locally is always faster and cheaper, if workers are available.
Facts about the TFWP
- The TFWP is one of the smallest of Canada’s immigration and international labour programs. There are far greater numbers in the permanent resident, refugee, international mobility and international student programs.
- TFWP TFWs represent under 1% of the Canadian workforce.
- There were significant new restrictions put in place in the fall of 2024. For example, with limited exceptions:
- No employer can hire lower wage TFWs (e.g., most restaurant workers) in census metropolitan areas unless local unemployment is under 6%.
- Low wage TFWs can only represent 10% of an employer's workforce.
- The government sets the wage rates and ensures that wages are at or above the prevailing (median) wage for that occupation in the region.
- Employers must pay an average of $10,000 in fees, permits and other costs to bring in even one lower skilled TFW. Some must even pay return airfare and assist with housing.
- Many employers report that their TFWs are their most expensive workers.
- Most often, TFWs fill positions that Canadians don’t want or cannot take. These include night shifts, labour intensive or outdoor work, or work in remote communities.
CFIB’s Position
CFIB members have consistently supported limited, responsible use of the TFWP to fill persistent labour gaps. Through surveys, thousands of small employers have shared that this program is sometimes the only tool that allows them to keep their doors open, especially in communities where there simply are not enough Canadian workers.
We agree that the program should be carefully managed and adjusted based on economic conditions. But calls to abolish the program outright are misguided and would severely harm small businesses across the country.
CFIB’s Advocacy
CFIB has a long history of working with governments to improve the TFWP and make it more workable for small firms. We have also consistently supported putting TFWs on a pathway to permanent residence after 1-2 years of work with an employer. More CFIB advocacy efforts:
A Balanced Approach
The TFWP is far from a first choice for small business owners. It is expensive, heavily regulated, and politically sensitive. But for many employers, particularly those requiring manual labour, or in rural and specialized sectors, it is the only choice to meet staffing needs, serve customers, and remain open.
Canada’s small businesses need a TFWP that is fair, flexible, and functional. Instead of tearing the program down, we should work together to reform it in ways that protect workers, meet local labour market needs, and give small business owners a fighting chance to succeed.
